Friday, October 01, 2004
KERRY'S MAN LOCKHART: DEBATE CONSENSUS A 'DRAW'
Unbeknownst to Kerry adviser Mike McCurry, a C-SPAN camera quietly followed McCurry as he found Kerry adviser Joe Lockhart on Spin Alley floor and asked him his impression of the debate. Lockhart candidly said to McCurry , “The consensus is it was a draw.”
Another Lie!
FLASH: Kerry stated: 'That's why they had to close down the subway in New York when the Republican Convention was there.' (Driving home point that Bush as not done enough to protect the country.)
The NYC subway did not close at all during the convention, according to a report on cable outlet NY1...
The NYC subway did not close at all during the convention, according to a report on cable outlet NY1...
Thursday, September 30, 2004
BUSH 1 - Kerry 0
First off just a thought. A casual watcher of debates at first glance would take away from tonight's first debate is that John Kerry has no core values or core beliefs. You could read by watching him that he has a very warped and revisionist view of reality.
Case in point would be his continuing insistence that we are in Iraq going it alone? We have over 30 allies in the War on Terror in Iraq fighting along side of us but yet Senator Kerry continues to denigrate and impune our allies that if under the unfortunate and highly unlikely possibility he would win in November he would need on his side. We have more allies in Iraq than we had in WWII.
Then in the same breath in the same debate when the President says that we are not going it alone in North Korea but working with other countries to hold North Korea accountable and put pressure on them with and through others Senator Kerry say' "no we need to go it alone in North Korea, we need Bi-Lateral talks." Where is the diplomacy that he so desires in Iraq, where is the coalition building he so much talks about and mis-leadingly (alright honestly lies about) in Iraq? Where is the handing over of our sovereignty that he is so willing to do in Iraq not what he wants in North Korea?
You fliped on Iraq but flopped to another position of action on North Korea. Huh?
This thread and line of exchange in the debates further reiterates his moral spinelessness when it comes to taking a position based on your core beliefs and values and standing firm as the President has done so with out hesitation as the leader of the Free world.
Is there a different "Global Test" that you must take for each country as Senator Kerry talked about tonight. And just what is this "Global Test" Senator Kerry sprung on us tonight? When did the President of the United States become required to bow down to a "Global Test" Mr. Kerry? I think this statement alone is evidence alone of what and who to your allegiances will be as President.
"I used the wrong language" when I talked about the 87 billion dollar appropriation bill for the troops. I think this is the same excuse you used to excuse your lies before congress in 1971 about our troops in Vietnam. Please Mr. Kerry, President Bush is supposed to be the one who mis-speaks not you with your upper class aristrocratic upbringing.
You lied when directly asked about calling the President a liar, was that a misuse of language again?
You said just the other day that you were not wrong on your positions on the war in Iraq because it "all depend on the outcome", to quote you. Lets just imagine Abraham Lincoln's Gettysburg address with "it all depends on the outcome" injected from time to time. Or FDR's decisions as President based on "it all depends on the outcome."
Mr. Kerry your pre-September 10th mentality show you to be the weak, unsteady and unreliable leader that you are, and that was abundantly apparent tonight on the debate. You came across as an arrogant, better than you, know it all elitist and shifty, flip flopping leader you are and would be. You looked like a finger waving pompous, condensing, liar that you are.
On the other side the President continued to show his heart for all Americans, his compassion for others and genuine passion to do the right thing and lead as great leaders do their countries in times of great peril. Churchill stood firm, FDR stood firm, Reagan stood firm and George W. Bush continues to stand firm. He did not turn on his fellow brothers as you have done time and time again over the years. The President has stood and continues to stand firm in his moral clarity, character convictions. Never wavering but standing firm for the American people.
One closing thought to add to the flips and flops, and lies and fabrications of John Kerry. After saying that General Tommy Franks had voice concern about Iraq, General Franks is on Fox News right now blowing the Kerry quote right out of the water, saying that John Kerry was wrong and was not truthful.
Why should we expect anything different from him now.
Case in point would be his continuing insistence that we are in Iraq going it alone? We have over 30 allies in the War on Terror in Iraq fighting along side of us but yet Senator Kerry continues to denigrate and impune our allies that if under the unfortunate and highly unlikely possibility he would win in November he would need on his side. We have more allies in Iraq than we had in WWII.
Then in the same breath in the same debate when the President says that we are not going it alone in North Korea but working with other countries to hold North Korea accountable and put pressure on them with and through others Senator Kerry say' "no we need to go it alone in North Korea, we need Bi-Lateral talks." Where is the diplomacy that he so desires in Iraq, where is the coalition building he so much talks about and mis-leadingly (alright honestly lies about) in Iraq? Where is the handing over of our sovereignty that he is so willing to do in Iraq not what he wants in North Korea?
You fliped on Iraq but flopped to another position of action on North Korea. Huh?
This thread and line of exchange in the debates further reiterates his moral spinelessness when it comes to taking a position based on your core beliefs and values and standing firm as the President has done so with out hesitation as the leader of the Free world.
Is there a different "Global Test" that you must take for each country as Senator Kerry talked about tonight. And just what is this "Global Test" Senator Kerry sprung on us tonight? When did the President of the United States become required to bow down to a "Global Test" Mr. Kerry? I think this statement alone is evidence alone of what and who to your allegiances will be as President.
"I used the wrong language" when I talked about the 87 billion dollar appropriation bill for the troops. I think this is the same excuse you used to excuse your lies before congress in 1971 about our troops in Vietnam. Please Mr. Kerry, President Bush is supposed to be the one who mis-speaks not you with your upper class aristrocratic upbringing.
You lied when directly asked about calling the President a liar, was that a misuse of language again?
You said just the other day that you were not wrong on your positions on the war in Iraq because it "all depend on the outcome", to quote you. Lets just imagine Abraham Lincoln's Gettysburg address with "it all depends on the outcome" injected from time to time. Or FDR's decisions as President based on "it all depends on the outcome."
Mr. Kerry your pre-September 10th mentality show you to be the weak, unsteady and unreliable leader that you are, and that was abundantly apparent tonight on the debate. You came across as an arrogant, better than you, know it all elitist and shifty, flip flopping leader you are and would be. You looked like a finger waving pompous, condensing, liar that you are.
On the other side the President continued to show his heart for all Americans, his compassion for others and genuine passion to do the right thing and lead as great leaders do their countries in times of great peril. Churchill stood firm, FDR stood firm, Reagan stood firm and George W. Bush continues to stand firm. He did not turn on his fellow brothers as you have done time and time again over the years. The President has stood and continues to stand firm in his moral clarity, character convictions. Never wavering but standing firm for the American people.
One closing thought to add to the flips and flops, and lies and fabrications of John Kerry. After saying that General Tommy Franks had voice concern about Iraq, General Franks is on Fox News right now blowing the Kerry quote right out of the water, saying that John Kerry was wrong and was not truthful.
Why should we expect anything different from him now.
Breaking News: Kerry for lights before being against them!
RNC Chairman Ed Gillespie: "Only John Kerry Could Be For The Lights Before He Was Against The Lights."
It Keeps Growing and Growing and Growing...
GDP grew at a 3.3% rate in the second quarter, revised upward from the 2.8% initially reported, Reuters reports:
"It looks like the economy wasn't all that soft in the second quarter," said economist Gary Thayer of A.G. Edwards and Sons Inc. in St. Louis, Missouri. "Generally, it shows the economy healthy and seeing growth in most categories."
"It looks like the economy wasn't all that soft in the second quarter," said economist Gary Thayer of A.G. Edwards and Sons Inc. in St. Louis, Missouri. "Generally, it shows the economy healthy and seeing growth in most categories."
Monday, September 27, 2004
Questions for Mr. Kerry
Just a few good questions that need to be answered by Senator Kerry:
--The Washington Times reported today that on CNN's "Crossfire" in 1997, you stated the following: "We know we can't count on the French. We know we can't count on the Russians. We know that Iraq is a danger to the United States, and we reserve the right to take pre-emptive action whenever we feel it's in our national interest." Do you still stand by any portion of that statement?
--Why did you skip Iraqi Prime Minister Ayad Allawi's speech to the joint meeting of Congress? Seemed like it might have been a pretty significant speech for a man who wants to be President to attend, especially considering the recent liberation of Iraq and the fact that he was the first Iraqi leader to visit D.C. since 1952, didn't it?
--Why would you allow your underlings to even hint, much less declare, that the leader of a newly freed country is merely a puppet of President Bush?
--You claim you would be able to get more allies to come to our side in future conflicts. Do you still believe that, considering your remarks demeaning the support given by our allies for "Operation Iraqi Freedom" and your campaign's treatment of Allawi?
--If you can question President Bush's military service, why can't he question yours (even though he hasn't)?
--You Democrats get really offended when anyone even appears to question your patriotism. Are you prepared to denounce the declaration by one of your fellow Democratic Senators, Fritz Hollings, this week that President Bush is a "damned draft dodger"? (And did you find it as strange as I did that any Clinton supporter would use such a phrase to try to demean a Republican President?)
--Another Democratic Senator, Tom Harkin, has made public statements calling Bush a liar concerning his military service, but the problem is that his claims were based on those fake CBS documents. Are you going to ask him to apologize -- or, at the very least, to zip it?
--In several newspapers today, your talkative wife, Teresa, was reported to have said that she thinks the Bush Administration will announce the capture of Osama bin Laden before Election Day. Apparently, she believes the White House has an October Surprise in mind. Did you tell her to say that, or did she just get it from Michael Moore?
--On the "Regis and Kelly" TV show, you told a story of a couple kids contributing to your campaign:
Kerry campaign donors apparently come in all sizes. He told Philbin and Ripa that a woman in New York gave him $385 that her 8-year-old son had raised selling homemade campaign buttons, and a 6-year-old in Philadelphia handed over a plastic container with $685 he had earned selling homemade campaign bracelets.
Did you return that money, since there was a fair chance they were illegal contributions? Even if they were legal, your campaign isn't in such dire straits that you would take money from children, right?
--Your campaign recently responded to a Bush/Cheney ad accusing you flip-flopping on top of a video of you wind-surfing. Your response ad ripped the Bush team for running a "juvenile" ad during the "Iraq quagmire." Do you see the irony that your campaign offered such a criticism, yet you were the one having photo-ops on your wind-surfing board and while walking around wearing spandex -- all of this done during the "Iraq quagmire"?
--The Washington Times reported today that on CNN's "Crossfire" in 1997, you stated the following: "We know we can't count on the French. We know we can't count on the Russians. We know that Iraq is a danger to the United States, and we reserve the right to take pre-emptive action whenever we feel it's in our national interest." Do you still stand by any portion of that statement?
--Why did you skip Iraqi Prime Minister Ayad Allawi's speech to the joint meeting of Congress? Seemed like it might have been a pretty significant speech for a man who wants to be President to attend, especially considering the recent liberation of Iraq and the fact that he was the first Iraqi leader to visit D.C. since 1952, didn't it?
--Why would you allow your underlings to even hint, much less declare, that the leader of a newly freed country is merely a puppet of President Bush?
--You claim you would be able to get more allies to come to our side in future conflicts. Do you still believe that, considering your remarks demeaning the support given by our allies for "Operation Iraqi Freedom" and your campaign's treatment of Allawi?
--If you can question President Bush's military service, why can't he question yours (even though he hasn't)?
--You Democrats get really offended when anyone even appears to question your patriotism. Are you prepared to denounce the declaration by one of your fellow Democratic Senators, Fritz Hollings, this week that President Bush is a "damned draft dodger"? (And did you find it as strange as I did that any Clinton supporter would use such a phrase to try to demean a Republican President?)
--Another Democratic Senator, Tom Harkin, has made public statements calling Bush a liar concerning his military service, but the problem is that his claims were based on those fake CBS documents. Are you going to ask him to apologize -- or, at the very least, to zip it?
--In several newspapers today, your talkative wife, Teresa, was reported to have said that she thinks the Bush Administration will announce the capture of Osama bin Laden before Election Day. Apparently, she believes the White House has an October Surprise in mind. Did you tell her to say that, or did she just get it from Michael Moore?
--On the "Regis and Kelly" TV show, you told a story of a couple kids contributing to your campaign:
Kerry campaign donors apparently come in all sizes. He told Philbin and Ripa that a woman in New York gave him $385 that her 8-year-old son had raised selling homemade campaign buttons, and a 6-year-old in Philadelphia handed over a plastic container with $685 he had earned selling homemade campaign bracelets.
Did you return that money, since there was a fair chance they were illegal contributions? Even if they were legal, your campaign isn't in such dire straits that you would take money from children, right?
--Your campaign recently responded to a Bush/Cheney ad accusing you flip-flopping on top of a video of you wind-surfing. Your response ad ripped the Bush team for running a "juvenile" ad during the "Iraq quagmire." Do you see the irony that your campaign offered such a criticism, yet you were the one having photo-ops on your wind-surfing board and while walking around wearing spandex -- all of this done during the "Iraq quagmire"?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)